Loquacious hubris, beauty, and insight | A New Kind of Science | Stephen Wolfram
 
 


Suche books:   



A New Kind of Science
Stephen Wolfram

Wolfram Media, 2002 - 1192 pages

average customer review:based on 330 reviews
view larger image
 for more information click here







Not original and not correct.

Wolfram's book is a nightmare to read but here's the idea. Basic physical processes throughout space-time are not the fundamental level of reality but are themselves made up of more basic computational processes. The idea that the universe is at bottom some kind of computer or cellular automata with bits governed by rules isn't new, Ed Fredkin has made this claim before.

The problem with this idea is that pure bits (just 0's or 1's), can't be the fundamental level of reality since any bit is just a difference between two basic states, and always has to be implemented by these more basic states. Reality can't be made up of pure differences and that's all bits are. A bit is just "placeholder" or "pure difference structure" that needs to refer to something such as voltage in a computer.


 for more information click here


YOU MUST ALL BE BLIND.

The Principle of Computational Equivalence suggests itself as the most primary induction possible. Debate its merits if you must. But if you concur with Dr. Wolfram that the PCE is fundamental, you are most likely correct.

The exciting notion is: if the PCE IS correct, it clearly marks the most profound effort of the human mind to comprehend the intracacies of complexity. I defy Wolfram's detractors to produce specific evidence to contradict the proposition of the Principle of Computational Equivalence. I personally witnessed Wolfram debate a quantum physicist about the merits of the PCE. The physicist had no idea how to metabolize Wolfram's theories. Wolfram's ideas are simply too general and too disruptive to the modern scientific paradigm.

But the physicist's repulsion can ultimately be understood. After all, Wolfram's ideas threaten the very notion of Science itself.

However, it is Science that must adapt to Wolfram - not the other way around.

And to the simpering, pathetic, myopic thinkers who dare scoff at this paradigm-shifting thesis - I challenge you to consider the implications that Wolfram's PCE might be correct. You will no doubt be terrified. In fact, you will most likely be incapable of even considering the PCE in a rational light.

THE SAD TRUTH IS THAT WOLFRAM'S IDEAS ARE FAR BEYOND THE VAST MAJORITY OF YOU. THOSE WHO REFUSE TO ACKNOWLEDGE THE PROFOUND IMPLICATIONS OF THE PCE ARE NOT JUST PARASITES ON THE PREVAILING MEME OF REDUCTIONISM BUT POOR SCIENTISTS AND IRRATIONAL THINKERS.

AND YOUR DAFT CYNICISM COULDN'T BE MORE HARMFUL AND RIDICULOUS.

AND YOUR INEXACT EVALUATIONS COULDN'T BE MORE TRANSPARENTLY INADEQUATE.

AND YOU WILL FAIL AT SUPRESSING THESE IDEAS.

AND HOPEFULLY YOU WILL CHOKE.


 for more information click here


Loquacious hubris, beauty, and insight

If you read the many public reviews of Wolfram's tome, you will find the same bipolar response registered here. I think, however, that a more measured reaction is possible if one neither buys SW's overblown sense of his own importance nor becomes irate at a person whose premature mastery of physics clearly inhibited his emotional development.

The book is far too long. The essential claims presented in it are fairly easily stated, clear, and not as surprising as they are made out to be. Further, many individuals who are only lightly mentioned and not documented contributed to the insights and methods on display.

Because he loves himself so well and values others so lightly, SW seems both grasping and greedy. Therefore, the net impression about WS's character is that he suffers from the arrested development of an indulged and talented child: he wants all the intellectual toys, even those with the names of other owners. While Wordsworth thought a man's reach should exceed his grasp, he did not encourage dreamers to mistake desire for mastery.

While the writing is usually clear, it is often repetitive, cliched, and self congratulatory. Indeed, the presentation is often as exhaustive and exhausting as the computer methodology employed. A strict editor would have been helpful.

If the egotism had been curtailed, the scope restricted to what the author knew best, credit given where it was merited, and the whole reduced by 80%, this volume would have been a much more successful. The pictures and diagrams were, I thought, both beautiful and interesting, and the volume is very generous in their presentation. Further, I think the book makes a very important contribution in its use of exhaustive computation to explore logical spaces, expand the general application of Godel's incompleteness theorem, and by suggesting the theoretical limits of definitively decoding inductive or deductive phenomena.

In short, I think this massive volume is worth selective admiration, but less would have been much more.


 for more information click here




 for more information click here


One of the best contributions to Modern Science

This review is coming from a highschooler and for all of you pathetic dweebs out there who consider this wonderful book a piece of crap, you are ignorant losers. Just because you people can't think of wonderful ideas like SW, why criticize him. It is a true masterpiece of modern science. i recommend this book to the whole world. And leaving out the losers, enjoy this wonderful book.






COMPUTATIONAL EQUVALENCE TRUTH

Your Professors are stupid evil Liars, and fear the Computational Equvalence Truth. Humans are the only educated stupid animal and too dumb to even know it. I am the wisest human and offer $1,000.00 to the 1st to disprove my wisdom. Humans are educated stupid because they are really dumb and cannot even comprehend the Computational Equvalence creation code when it is explained to them.

Think of the Computational Equvalence as a 4-corner class-room representing the 4-corners of Earth, wherein, stupid educators teach erroneous 1-corner self aggrandizing singularity- that equates a deadly poison to Equvalent humanity.

Creation is a Equvalence Princple, & you are too dumb to know. To ignore it, indicts you evil. God lets little children starve, so no adults are worth saving.

YOU are the lowest form.
YOU can't procreate alone.
YOU destroyed the village.
YOU destroyed the family.
YOU destroyed childhood.
YOU destroyed naturalism.
YOU don't know the Truth.
YOU pitiful mindless fools,
YOU are educated stupid.
YOU worship inequivalent word.
YOU are your own poison.
YOU create your own hell.
YOU must seek Computational Equvalence.


 for more information click here


reviews: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, page 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19



hot or not?    What's your opinion?     Write a review and share your thoughts!






recommendations

TOP 100 most explosive books on earth
My "desert island" list, part 48
Books for escaping the matrix
science from the Edge
Digital Philosophy







   


search for books
new kind of, kind, new, science




Suche books:   


books
apparel
baby
beauty
books
camera photo
cell phones
classical music
computers
dvd
electronics
gourmet food
health personal care
kitchen
magazines
musical instruments
office products
outdoor living
computer video games
popular music
pet-supplies
software
sporting goods
tools hardware
toys-games
vhs
watches jewelry


* Flowers for London Flower Delivery UK by online florists

* London Wedding Photographer

randomly chosen


book: Black Medicine, Vol. III: Low Blows (Black Medicine)


leave a comment


home  impressum - about us